Homepage / Technology / What Russia's Facebook war didn't do
States are so eager to win Amazon's HQ2 they're offering the company as much as $7 billion A new bill would require Facebook and Google to publicly archive ads purchased around elections A scientific breakthrough offers hope for an AIDS vaccine One of the hottest smart home start-ups in Silicon Valley was just acquired A new Tencent game lets users virtually clap for a leader of the Chinese communist party Verizon meets earnings expectations and beats Wall Street's forecast for revenue Elon Musk says his second tunnel digging machine for The Boring Company is 'almost ready' Private jets are getting cheaper Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are not 'mature' enough to regulate, ECB chief Mario Draghi says Companies that burn up $1bn a year are sexy, dangerous, and statistically doomed Viral Chinese video game measures which players can clap fastest for President Xi Jinping On NAFTA, America, Canada and Mexico are miles apart Spain to suspend Catalonia's autonomy after regional leader fails to drop independence bid Bitcoin is not the new gold, Goldman Sachs says New Zealand Labour to form next government with support of small nationalist party Here are the best cities to claim your pension — but all fall short of a relaxing retirement Unilever blames poor weather for slowing growth Want to learn about fintech? There's a course for that Backroom battle imperils $230 million cryptocurrency venture LSE CEO Rolet to step down by end of 2018 Roche third-quarter sales beat forecasts with boost from new multiple sclerosis medicine London is the European hotspot for venture capitalists when it comes to fintech SAP third-quarter growth slows with dip in cloud subscriptions Europe set for mixed open as investors look to earnings, Catalonia deadline China's central bank is warning about a sudden collapse in asset prices China's central bank governor says he's likely to retire soon This ex-Googler is bringing self-driving excavators to construction sites India's high-flying start-ups are getting a dose of harsh reality Here comes Chinese GDP data at a pivotal time for the country MongoDB will raise $192 million in IPO, making it worth $1.2 billion Asia markets await China data after Dow closes above 23,000 for the first time Blue Apron layoffs hit office hardest, warehouse workers mostly spared, say sources Lawmakers urge US to craft targeted sanctions on Myanmar military Cramer Remix: Johnson & Johnson is out of battleground territory Cramer: Facebook's latest acquisition is a 'terrific insurance bet' against Snap Firm says it was wrong about Snap and slashes key estimate in half — but still no 'sell' rating IBM will get a strong tailwind from the weak dollar, CFO Martin Schroeter says Cramer sees great buying opportunities in 'Washington's shenanigans' Bids for Amazon's second headquarters are due Thursday – here are all the cities in the running Blue Apron cuts 6 percent of its workforce Amazon is spreading itself thin and getting into the ‘danger zone,’ analyst says Adobe shares jump more than 5 percent on 2018 profit forecast Snap's newest product is a 'dancing hot dog' costume Wall Street veterans are trickling into digital asset management State pension funds continue to fall behind. Here's how much you owe Senators are pushing to curb election meddling on social media Here are 4 top chip stock ideas for the next year: Barclays Russians used Facebook Messenger to interfere with election, top executive says Samsung is playing catch-up with Apple's Siri and the Google Assistant The federal lawmakers who regulate Amazon are begging the company to move to their home states Warren Buffett just made nearly $800 million in IBM, a stock he doesn’t even like that much The 2017 chart of the stock market looks 'eerily similar' to the one that crashed 30 years ago Google's AI subsidiary made a game-playing program that's entirely self-taught Xi sees US retreating on world stage and seeks to fill void as 'most powerful' Chinese leader in 45 years Tech companies are suddenly spending much more on lobbying as NAFTA negotiations loom Shares of IBM just did something they haven’t done in 15 years 'It's very hard not to give tax cuts to the wealthy,' Steven Mnuchin now says Bond market flashing warning sign even as stocks rally to new highs Mohawk Tribe sues Microsoft, Amazon for patent infringement Bitcoin plunges nearly 9% on fears of greater oversight from US regulators US 10-year yield flashes possible warning: Dallas Fed's Kaplan Chinese fintech company Qudian spikes more than 40 percent in IPO 'The housing market can't take the shock of a natural event,' real estate economist warns The Apple Watch is finally taking off, says analyst By selling now, investors risk missing an additional 'melt-up' in the market Amazon's next big bet is letting you communicate without a smartphone, says Alexa's chief scientist Cramer: IBM is not a Warren Buffett story anymore but about 'reignition of earnings' IBM sees biggest jump in 8 years after earnings beat Rising seas threaten nearly $1 trillion worth of US homes, says Zillow Germany's Hochtief confirms $20 billion bid for Spain's Abertis Amazon's $13.7 billion bet on online grocery ordering hasn't convinced shoppers to stay home The same federal lawmakers who regulate Amazon are wooing the company in the race for HQ2 OPEC reportedly favors 9-month extension to output cut deal in bid to boost oil prices Stephen Curry’s new shoe will spark an Under Armour turnaround: Analyst Apple and GE are writing software to help detect when jet engines could fail Merck shares jump after Citi upgrade on stronger cancer drug sales US investors should get some international exposure Elon Musk is 'fixated on Mars' but Bezos and I want space to better Earth, says Richard Branson Hurricanes Harvey and Irma drive housing starts down to a one-year low When the revolution eats itself Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: CVX, MGM, ANTM, IBM, CREE, AMZN & more Hillary Clinton says US threats of war with North Korea are 'dangerous' and 'short-sighted' Twitter’s new user rules crack down on nudity and 'unwanted sexual advances' The only thing scary about the Dow is that nothing seems to scare it Economist lays out a ‘concerning’ trend for Apple stock 1 billion users could be using 5G by 2023 with China set to dominate, study says The big question for US cities: Is Amazon’s HQ2 worth the price? Google and Goldman Sachs are two of the most active investors in blockchain firms Iraq calls on BP to 'quickly' develop disputed oilfields after seizing areas of Kirkuk Amazon, eBay accused of ‘profiting’ from tax fraud in UK JPMorgan buys fintech start-up WePay WhatsApp is blocked in China and VPNs are being hit as the Communist Party Congress begins Xi Jinping makes big promises for China's economic future Akzo Nobel issues profit warning after third-quarter earnings miss Boeing says Bombardier jets could still face hefty duties even if they are assembled in Alabama European shares expected to open on a positive note as earnings season picks up the pace InterContinental is bringing two new hotel brands to Asia India's troubled banks desperately need more money — but government help just isn't coming An upcoming fintech IPO is set to be 2017's largest Chinese listing in the US Amazon has brought benefits—and disruption—to Seattle

Technology

What Russia's Facebook war didn't do

For those Democrats waiting for some evidence that will prove the Russians stole the 2016 presidential election, it’s not much but better than nothing: The revelations that Russian agents ran hundreds of fake Facebook accounts trafficking divisive stories as well as similar activity on other platforms such as Google and LinkedIn give us some idea about how a hostile foreign power run by a dictator thinks it can manipulate American public opinion. The fake accounts posted inflammatory stories, pictures, and videos that, in the words of the New York Times’ deep dive into the matter, “harvested American rage to reshape U.S. politics.”

That seems to back up a narrative of Russian responsibility for Trump‘s victory even if it does nothing to show collusion with the GOP. But those looking to this as an excuse for Hillary Clinton’s loss are deluding themselves.

There’s nothing particularly new about Russian efforts to sow dissension inside the United States and other democracies, but it is nonetheless disturbing to learn about the mix of sophistication and crudity in Moscow’s efforts. Yet this story doesn’t do much to back up the idea that a coherent Russian conspiracy of some sort aiming at electing Trump was a major factor in the outcome. Vladimir Putin may have preferred Trump to Hillary Clinton as his American protagonist. But what we now know about the Russian campaign is that it was not only far more diffuse than a mere pro-Trump effort but that their efforts were also merely a faint echo of broader trends that were being far more successfully exploited by Americans.

More from National Review:
The legal resistance to President Trump
Flag protests and the power of symbols
The grave-hunter, hunted

Outrage over a foreign power’s engaging in such activities is entirely justified. But in order to believe that it was the Russians who were, as the Times claims, reshaping American politics, you’d have to ignore the fact that Trump was sowing dissension with divisive statements and taking advantage of existing cultural and political fault lines in American society long before the Russians were investing in Facebook accounts.

The first problem with the notion of the Facebook accounts’ constituting proof of a stolen election is that not all of what was being promoted on them was aimed at helping Trump. As the Times reports, some of the material was devoted to exposing discriminatory treatment of American Muslims, a topic that would, in theory, make voters more inclined to back Hillary Clinton or at least to despise Trump.

This is a crucial point because it shows that what the Russians did in 2016 was more or less in line with tactics they’ve been using since the Kremlin was run by Communists rather than an autocrat like Putin. The common denominator in all of the Russian posts — whether aimed at whipping up resentment on the right or the left — was to discredit Western democracy. The Russian/Soviet intention was never so much to favor one candidate over the other — though prior to 2016, they certainly preferred, as a general rule, Democrats to Republicans. Their main goal was to undermine the idea that representative democracy was inherently superior to their own tyrannical system.

Russian accounts were happy to fuel all sorts of anger, no matter what its source or target, so long as it promoted the notion that American democracy was a fraud. That’s the same pattern their destabilization efforts have followed whether ordered by Soviet bureaucrats or Putin’s underlings in democracies across the globe.

Yet this behavior never generated much interest from the mainstream media prior to the Trump–Clinton matchup.

Part of the explanation for this stems from the recent rise of social media as a pervasive force in American society. The Russians were always trying to persuade Americans that their own country was a terrible place, but the Internet and social media provide the sort of widely accessible forums that make it easier to peddle lies and fake news on a mass scale.

But just as important is the fact that the American Left and the liberal media never felt particularly threatened by Russian destabilization campaigns until Trump arrived on the national scene. Four years earlier, Democrats chortled heartily when President Obama mocked Mitt Romney in their foreign-policy debate for describing Russia as the chief geostrategic foe of the United States. That year, it was Obama who told Putin underling Dmitri Medvedev in a hot mic moment that he should tell “Vladimir” that he (Obama) would have “more flexibility” to accommodate his demands after he got re-elected. That’s exactly the kind of quid pro quo smoking gun Democrats would take as proof of collusion between Trump and Putin. But it didn’t bother them when it was Obama doing the colluding.

The real question to ask about this story is what exactly the Russians were doing to expose the seamy side of American politics that wasn’t already being done by Republican and Democratic operatives, not to mention the presidential candidates? Trump and everyone else dragging the 2016 election into the sewer needed no lessons in divisiveness from Russians who were merely recycling popular memes and sometimes doing so without properly translating them into English. That the Russians figured out how to use Facebook to promote their goals isn’t shocking. But the claim that these ads altered the results of the election to any degree is shocking because they were no better or worse than the flood of negative attacks that was already deluging Americans.

Social media helps exacerbate the bifurcated nature of American society since most users insulate themselves from those with different beliefs and loyalties. That’s why it’s not clear that the Russian ads reached many people who weren’t already receptive to those messages.

Americans should prod their government to take measures to better monitor foreign interference in the future. But, as with everything else we’ve learned about the 2016 campaign, there’s still no reason to believe liberal conspiracy theories about a stolen election or to even think the troubling Russian efforts were actually effective in aiding Trump. Democrats looking for reasons to explain his victory other than Trump’s ability to reflect the discontent of the voters and Hillary Clinton’s lack of credibility are doing the country and themselves a disservice.

Commentary by Jonathan S. Tobin, an opinion editor of JNS.org and a contributor at National Review. Follow him on Twitter @jonathans_tobin.

For more insight from CNBC contributors, follow @CNBCopinion on Twitter.

©2017 National Review. Used with permission.

Source: Tech CNBC
What Russia's Facebook war didn't do

Comments are closed.