China has tightened the purse strings on foreign investment, but the government’s crackdown could completely backfire, hurting the very companies it’s seeking to firm up.

Chinese companies had been on a massive shopping spree — outbound deals hit a new record every year since 2009, soaring 500 percent to a whopping $200 billion last year. But authorities grew worried about economic and financial risks. Cash flying offshore added more pressure to an already weakening yuan, and it was unclear how much debt firms were taking on to buy everything from luxury resorts to soccer clubs.

It didn’t take long for Beijing to strengthen capital controls, and to issue rules on what kind of acquisitions would be banned, restricted and encouraged. Regulators are reviewing the debt involved at China’s most acquisitive companies, along with purchases made. The government may even force firms to offload non-performing assets in a fire sale to improve financial health – but experts say Beijing is going to have trouble doing that.

“If Beijing now wants to employ a strategy of forcing companies to unwind the acquisitions … they’re going to run into some headwinds,” said Chunsek Chan, global head of mergers and acquisitions and financial sponsors research at Dealogic. “If they want to sell the companies at the same valuation that they got them at in the first place, they may struggle to find buyers.”

Chinese firms were new to foreign acquisitions, and their playbook was to aggressively outbid everybody else. “Other buyers were not willing to pay such high valuations back then — why would they want to do it now?” Chan said.

Shanghai-based conglomerate Fosun famously engaged in a two-year bidding war for luxury resort Club Med, which ended with the company paying a nearly 80 percent premium over the chain’s pre-battle stock price. It seemed unusually expensive considering Club Med was unprofitable, last paying a dividend in 2001.

At the time, Moody’s rated the deal credit negative, saying it didn’t expect the investment to materially increase Club Med’s cash flow or earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) – a measure of a company’s operating performance – in the short term. It looked like Fosun had bought a lemon.

Acquiring at significantly high prices reached a peak in 2015, the year the Fosun deal closed. The median value of China’s overseas acquisitions hit 16 times EBITDA, versus the global median of 13 times, according to Dealogic data. That means Chinese companies were acquiring firms at much higher valuations than global peers.

Now, “there’s a good chance they’ll have to sell at a lower price than they bought,” said Yuval Tal, a partner at law firm Proskauer who specializes in cross-border mergers and acquisitions.

But “selling at a discount [means] you’re locking in a permanent loss of capital, which is not what the intention … was in the first place,” Chan said. “So forcing these companies to unwind could have the opposite effect.”

In other words, if Beijing were to order a sale of company assets, it could end up hurting, rather than helping, the bottom line.

A big question also looms over the $80 billion in pending Chinese outbound deals, some of which don’t comply with new regulations on the kinds of acquisitions allowed. Real estate, for instance, is now on a restricted list of sectors along with entertainment, sports, and film studios. But property investments represent the biggest proportion of pending deals, accounting for 38 percent, according to Dealogic data.

If those fall apart, that’s not positive news for the global real estate industry. “It takes out a class of buyers that could potentially buy at higher prices,” Tal said.

China’s overseas direct property investment has already fallen 82 percent in the first half of 2017. Analysts forecast the downward trend will continue, leading to a “material slowdown,” with transaction volume and prices expected to come under pressure, according to a Morgan Stanley report.

It’s not all bearish news. Going forward, “some of the money that would have been deployed offshore could now be deployed onshore, and that could be a positive for the Chinese market,” said Nicholas Holt, head of Asia Pacific research at real estate consultancy Knight Frank.

But here’s the catch: China’s domestic property market is historically volatile, and trying to control the real estate bubble has long vexed authorities. So that’s yet another way Beijing’s crackdown on overseas investment could lead to unintended consequences.

The government’s curbs have dramatically slowed outbound deals from China. They’re down 40 percent in the first six months of the year to $74 billion. But experts anticipate the tide to eventually turn as Chinese companies keep looking for ways to invest abroad.

“There’s been such a relaxation after the whole world was awash with Chinese money in these deals … [but] there is still a lot money sitting in China, and Asia in general, looking for diversification,” Tal said.

“The reasons to get the money out are still there — when there’s a lot of money that needs to move, it finds a way.”