JPMorgan research analysts said in a note Thursday that Wal-Mart could be drawn to Whole Foods for its relatively wealthier customers and strong brand, not to mention the chance to thwart Amazon’s ambitions. It is in a better position than other retailers such as Kroger, Costco or Target coming in over the top, the analysts said.
“We do think there is a chance that Walmart makes a bid,” the report said. “WMT stands out as the only company in our coverage with the means and motive to counterbid, but the motive is ultimately more driven by a defensive strategy.”
Wal-Mart and Amazon and did not immediately respond to CNBC requests for comment.
The note was written by JPMorgan analysts Ken Goldman, Chris Horvers and Doug Anmuth. Whole Foods Market shares closed at $43.26 Wednesday.
The analysts said if Wal-Mart does bid for Whole Foods it is unlikely to win “given Amazon’s war chest of cash/stock and the value of the WFM platform to Amazon.” Wal-Mart already has more than 20 percent market share of the grocery business, so Whole Foods isn’t as strategically important to the retailer as it is for Amazon, they said.
“We don’t believe a serious bid comes out of Bentonville that wouldn’t be countered,” the report said, referring to Wal-Mart’s headquarters city. They also said a bidding war could distract Wal-Mart from its own strategic effort to get better at beating Amazon at its own game: e-commerce.
Amazon has the resources to raise its bid to compete with a rival suitor. JPMorgan also noted that even if Amazon bids $72 a share for Whole Foods, it would “only be 5 percent of its market cap.” The $400 million break-up fee falls on Whole Foods if the deal falls apart.
Also, the analysts said, Whole Foods “seems unusually excited by the prospect of having Amazon as a parent. We do not think an alternative suitor would evoke the same reaction.”
A Whole Foods Market spokesperson wrote “we don’t have anything to add” on this story in an email.
Wal-Mart could enter a bidding war with Amazon over Whole Foods, JPMorgan says