Homepage / Technology / Hacks Raise Fear Over N.S.A.’s Hold on Cyberweapons
Kiçik təyyarə oyunu 1xBet 1xbet Aviator gam The way to select a Data Bedroom Service Bewertungen zu Vulkanvegas Lesen Sie Kundenbewertungen zu vulkanvegas com 3 von 5 小柳商事株式会 Mostbet Türkiye mobil uygulamasını indi Participate in A European Romance Website & Meet The Match What to anticipate in VDR Providers paribahis 717 Best Country To get yourself a Wife: Asia, Europe & Latin America Technology and Asylum Procedures Business Process and Digitalization How to begin Your Blog With no Investment Software For Modern Business Setting Up the Electronic Data Areas Greatest On-line Relationship Websites & Apps: Comparison Legal Support and Advice Intended for Small Businesses The very best Virtual VDR Providers 9 Tips for Working With Teams in Different Timezones Australian Brides Deliver Order Birdes-to-be From Quotes Korean Brides -mail Order Brides From Southern Korea Choosing a Data Place Antivirus Solutions — What to Look For within a Good Anti-virus Solution Best Alternatives of VPN Software New Step by Step Roadmap for Marijuana News Mail-order Bride Wikipedia Relationship With A Russian Mail Order Bride: Can It Develop Suitable Family? Steve Munger: These Primary Guidelines Made Me Effective In Life With Warren Buffett, Thought about All Three Guide To Choosing The Right Mailbox Order Star of the event Web Site In 2023 Few Wins $3 Million In Pennsylvania Lotto Scratcher, Strategies Trip Privately owned Internet Access Avast Review Powerful Deal Achievement Top Rated Free VPN Services Adaware Review – Is Adaware Review Right For You? Large 15 Best Countries To find a Spouse In 2023 Online dating services Reviews Ideal Legit Snail mail Order Bride-to-be Sites To Decide On In 2023 & Feedback Thailänder Brides Pleasant Thai Mailbox Order Wedding brides To Marry Thailänder Brides Get A Thailand Deliver Order Bride The principal Expenses Ukrainian Mail Order Spouse Cost Includes The Nations Just where Girls Have One Of The Best Lives, In Chart Partner Of Ukraines Spy Fundamental Was Poisoned, Officers Say The Model Ny Occasions New Restaurants And Pop-ups To Try In L A This 12 Los Angeles Situations Ways to Discover United states Marriage Details Romancescout: Your Information To On-line Relationship Evaluations, Recommendations Tes Ship Order Bride-to-be Discover A Overseas Spouse Across the internet Free With Jetbride Com Powerful Interracial Marriages Exquisite Interracial Lovers Exactly what the Best Online dating Websites? Very best Dating Web page Reviews – Find Your web Soul Mate Ways to Create Online dating sites Profiles Long Relationship Suggestions Long Relationship Suggestions How to begin a Successful Wife Search Getting married to a Russian Child The right way to Meet Delightful Ladies Around the World To recognize Know About Ukrainian Single Girls Dating The Different Types of Sugar Daddies The key benefits of Dating a Latina Top 5 International Dating Sites Russian Women Seeking Men Overseas Cookware Interracial Lovers and the Backlash Against All of them Getting the Marriage License and Wedding ceremony Done Correct How to pick the Best Web based Marriage Company Flirting Tips For Timid People Delightful Interracial Lovers Crucial Russian Females Dating Suggestions for Men Steps to create the Most of Dating An individual From Another Country Web based Top five Romantic Honeymoon Destinations Just what Soulmate? Web based Relationships Suggestions The Challenges of Dating An individual From A further Country Setting Expectations just for Online Sugar Daddy Arrangements Marital relationship License and Ceremony Why Are Latinas Heated? Getting Foreign Bride-to-be Tips on how to Propose — What’s the Best Way to Say “I Do”? Is usually Your Long Distance Marriage Moving Too quickly? Dating Etiquette — The Modern Rules of Seeing A Quick Guide to the Use of NLP in Chatbots Building Trust in Human relationships Les mariages interracials les plus réussis sont ceux basés sur l’amour & le respect Browsing through Cultural Differences in Asian Human relationships How you can Have a cheerful Marriage The right way to Fix a Relationship With out Hurting Your companion How to Spice Up a lengthy Distance Relationship The main advantages of Online Dating What is the Best Female Race to Marry? Western european Women Stereotypes Why Asian Girls Like Bright white Guys How to Succeed in On the web Relationships Top 5 Online Connections Tips Top 5 Online Connections Tips Leading Countries With Best Foreign Brides Powerful Interracial Relationships Asian Wedding Icon Meanings Where to Find a Deliver Order Star of the wedding Wedding ceremony Traditions in Ukraine For what reason Asian Girls Like Light Guys Asian Brides Via the internet Tips on how to Propose – What’s the simplest way to Say “I Do”?

Technology

Hacks Raise Fear Over N.S.A.’s Hold on Cyberweapons

Twice in the past month, National Security Agency cyberweapons stolen from its arsenal have been turned against two very different partners of the United States — Britain and Ukraine.

The N.S.A. has kept quiet, not acknowledging its role in developing the weapons. White House officials have deflected many questions, and responded to others by arguing that the focus should be on the attackers themselves, not the manufacturer of their weapons.

But the silence is wearing thin for victims of the assaults, as a series of escalating attacks using N.S.A. cyberweapons have hit hospitals, a nuclear site and American businesses. Now there is growing concern that United States intelligence agencies have rushed to create digital weapons that they cannot keep safe from adversaries or disable once they fall into the wrong hands.

On Wednesday, the calls for the agency to address its role in the latest attacks grew louder, as victims and technology companies cried foul. Representative Ted Lieu, a California Democrat and a former Air Force officer who serves on the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs Committees, urged the N.S.A. to help stop the attacks and to stop hoarding knowledge of the computer vulnerabilities upon which these weapons rely.

In an email on Wednesday evening, Michael Anton, a spokesman for the National Security Council at the White House, noted that the government “employs a disciplined, high-level interagency decision-making process for disclosure of known vulnerabilities” in software, “unlike any other country in the world.”

More from The New York Times:
Security experts scramble to contain fallout from cyberattacks
The risk in using a public phone charger
With new digital tools, even nonexperts can wage cyberattacks

Mr. Anton said the administration “is committed to responsibly balancing national security interests and public safety and security,” but declined to comment “on the origin of any of the code making up this malware.”

Beyond that, the government has blamed others. Two weeks ago, the United States — through the Department of Homeland Security — said it had evidence North Korea was responsible for a wave of attacks in May using ransomware called WannaCry that shut down hospitals, rail traffic and production lines. The attacks on Tuesday against targets in Ukraine, which spread worldwide, appeared more likely to be the work of Russian hackers, though no culprit has been formally identified.

In both cases, the attackers used hacking tools that exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft software. The tools were stolen from the N.S.A., and a group called the Shadow Brokers made them public in April. The group first started offering N.S.A. weapons for sale in August, and recently even offered to provide N.S.A. exploits to paid monthly subscribers.

Though the identities of the Shadow Brokers remain a mystery, former intelligence officials say there is no question from where the weapons came: a unit deep within the agency that was until recently called “Tailored Access Operations.”

While the government has remained quiet, private industry has not. Brad Smith, the president of Microsoft, said outright that the National Security Agency was the source of the “vulnerabilities” now wreaking havoc and called on the agency to “consider the damage to civilians that comes from hoarding these vulnerabilities and the use of these exploits.”

For the American spy agency, which has invested billions of dollars developing an arsenal of weapons that have been used against the Iranian nuclear program, North Korea’s missile launches and Islamic State militants, what is unfolding across the world amounts to a digital nightmare. It was as if the Air Force lost some of its most sophisticated missiles and discovered an adversary was launching them against American allies — yet refused to respond, or even to acknowledge that the missiles were built for American use.

Officials fret that the potential damage from the Shadow Brokers leaks could go much further, and the agency’s own weaponry could be used to destroy critical infrastructure in allied nations or in the United States.

“Whether it’s North Korea, Russia, China, Iran or ISIS, almost all of the flash points out there now involve a cyber element,” Leon E. Panetta, the former defense secretary and Central Intelligence Agency chief said in a recent interview, before the weapons were turned against American interests.

“I’m not sure we understand the full capability of what can happen, that these sophisticated viruses can suddenly mutate into other areas you didn’t intend, more and more,” Mr. Panetta said. “That’s the threat we’re going to face in the near future.”

Using the remnants of American weapons is not entirely new. Elements of Stuxnet, the computer worm that disabled the centrifuges used in Iran’s nuclear weapons program seven years ago, have been incorporated in some attacks.

In the past two months, attackers have retrofitted the agency’s more recent weapons to steal credentials from American companies. Cybercriminals have used them to pilfer digital currency. North Korean hackers are believed to have used them to obtain badly needed currency from easy hacking targets like hospitals in England and manufacturing plants in Japan.
And on Tuesday, on the eve of Ukraine’s Constitution Day — which commemorates the country’s first constitution after breaking away from the Soviet Union — attackers used N.S.A.-developed techniques to freeze computers in Ukrainian hospitals, supermarkets, and even the systems for radiation monitoring at the old Chernobyl nuclear plant.

The so-called ransomware that gained the most attention in the Ukraine attack is believed to have been a smoke screen for a deeper assault aimed at destroying victims’ computers entirely. And while WannaCry had a kill switch that was used to contain it, the attackers hitting Ukraine made sure there was no such mechanism. They also ensured that their code could infect computers that had received software patches intended to protect them.

“You’re seeing a refinement of these capabilities, and it only heads in one direction,” said Robert Silvers, the former assistant secretary of cyber policy at the Department of Homeland Security, now a partner at the law firm Paul Hastings.

Though the original targets of Tuesday’s attacks appear to have been government agencies and businesses in Ukraine, the attacks inflicted enormous collateral damage, taking down some 2,000 global targets in more than 65 countries, including Merck, the American drug giant, Maersk, the Danish shipping company, and Rosneft, the Russian state owned energy giant. The attack so crippled operations at a subsidiary of Federal Express that trading had to be briefly halted for FedEx stock.

“When these viruses fall into the wrong hands, people can use them for financial gain, or whatever incentive they have — and the greatest fear is one of miscalculation, that something unintended can happen,” Mr. Panetta said.

Mr. Panetta was among the officials warning years ago of a “cyber Pearl Harbor” that could bring down the American power grid. But he and others never imagined that those same enemies might use the N.S.A.’s own cyberweapons.

For the past six years, government officials were comforted by the fact that their

most fervent adversaries — North Korea, Iran, extremist groups — did not have the skills or digital tools to inflict major damage. The bigger cyberpowers, Russia and China in particular, seemed to exercise some restraint, though Russia’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election added a new, more subtle threat.

But armed with the N.S.A.’s own tools, the limits are gone.

“We now have actors, like North Korea and segments of the Islamic State, who have access to N.S.A. tools who don’t care about economic and other ties between nation states,” said Jon Wellinghoff, the former chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

So long as flaws in computer code exist to create openings for digital weapons and spy tools, security experts say, the N.S.A. is not likely to stop hoarding software vulnerabilities any time soon.

Source: Tech CNBC
Hacks Raise Fear Over N.S.A.’s Hold on Cyberweapons

Comments are closed.