Homepage / Technology / How 2017 became a turning point for tech giants
Dow stock Boeing is up over 100% in one year, and some say the run isn't over Google CEO: You don't need to code to be successful at many jobs of the future—but you'll need this Netflix could see a huge move on earnings next week Netflix shares to surge on big international subscriber gains, analyst predicts What will Trump say at Davos? Six analysts give their predictions I tried to get my iPhone 6 battery replaced — here's what happened Jan Koum got the idea for $19 billion WhatsApp after missing too many iPhone calls at the gym Home security firm ADT drops 10% in NYSE debut Cramer: I'm fine with Amazon raising monthly Prime prices because it's still cheap Staten Island-based 'CabbageTech' charged with bitcoin-related fraud after promising 300% returns in a week Kohl's shares could pop 50% as Amazon partnership ramps up Trump's market cheerleading tweets could end up fueling a bubble New GOP tax law will boost corporate earnings at least 10%, says Merrill Lynch wealth manager Rising mortgage rates could mean even fewer homes for sale this spring Nike shares jump after analyst predicts a rally on new sneaker sales Investor 'fear of missing out' runs wild as record amount of money flows into stocks the last four weeks A crucial German vote this Sunday is seen as the key near-term driver for euro/dollar Oil price rally will not persuade OPEC to end production cuts, analyst says LA Times' Levinsohn under investigation after report on sex harassment Amazon is raising its monthly Prime membership rate There's a new venture fund founded by a former DJI and Tesla engineer and an ex-Kleiner partner Amazon and Nvidia are hiring people to cozy up to health VCs The executive in charge of Facebook’s efforts to court China has left the company 6 global trends that can derail your portfolio in 2018 Huawei executives are self-imposing a fine of nearly half a million dollars for inflated sales data Square shares pop after analyst says its similar to 'Amazon or Google in their early days' London's 'almost toxic' housing market might not give investors the returns they are looking for Hot tech stock Nvidia has even more room to run, says technical analyst Gaming giant Nvidia, after 113% gain, could surge another 23%, BofA analyst says Walmart will see a larger breakout after ‘lost’ years, Oppenheimer analyst says The bull case for Netflix ahead of earnings The UK’s foreign minister wants to build a 22-mile bridge to France Rising hedge fund stars are crushing the market, taking crown away from Einhorn, Ackman New Zealand PM set to be only the second world leader to give birth while in office The bond yield that helps price all sorts of loans just jumped to its highest level since 2014 Berlusconi has been in politics for nearly three decades. This is the secret to his popularity Indonesian leader's third cabinet reshuffle could have elections implications Who are ‘Davos Man’ and ‘Davos Woman’? European stocks seen mixed ahead of earnings, data Bitcoin could be here for 100 years but it's more likely to 'totally collapse,' Nobel laureate says China says sunken Iranian tanker may be leaking bunker fuel South Korean group files complaint against Apple CEO over iPhone slowdown What happens during a US government shutdown Bitcoin is 'something regulators need to deal with but not ban,' says former FDIC chair Cramer Remix: How I decide which retailers are not buyable Cramer's lightning round: Hormel's one of the few food stocks I like Cramer tracks 4 growing market discrepancies: Rates, Trump, cryptocurrencies and stocks Asian markets poised to open with moderate gains despite softer US lead IBM executive says blockchain 'creates a lot of value' for manufacturers, retailers Bitcoin's on a wild ride, but investors have shown it's here to stay, analyst says Cramer: I've never seen a market like this in my life Atlassian beats estimates, but its shares fall anyway Snap laid off two dozen employees and half of them were from its content team Tesla bringing Model 3 to three East Coast showrooms This start-up founder has a novel strategy for getting ahead: Telling the truth Texas Instruments' long-time CEO is stepping down after the stock rallied 57% in the past year Trump says he called and thanked Tim Cook after Apple revealed its US investment plan There's 'no evidence' Tasers reduce police use of firearms, new study shows IBM shares fall despite first growth in 23 quarters Tim Cook tells Cramer: New tax law helped pave the way for Apple’s massive investment plan Uber's Kalanick ignored warnings from execs about buying self-driving truck start-up Otto, says report Washington, DC, and Austin are shaping up as strong contenders for Amazon's new headquarters Legacy airlines are facing new competitors on transatlantic routes Here’s how cities are reacting to being finalists for Amazon HQ2 A high schooler interviewed Apple CEO Tim Cook — and he told her his secret to success Another top Silicon Valley investor slams politically correct tech culture, praises China Steve Wozniak is still on Apple's payroll four decades after co-founding the company Bank of America loses its second head of tech and media banking in less than a year Three of the finalists for Amazon's second headquarters are in or near Washington DC Wrong on GE, market-beating value investor Bill Nygren says he is sticking by tanking blue chip Apple may have just saved the GOP Bitcoin rallies more than 30% to briefly top $12,000 in latest wild swing GE shares drop to 6-year low below $17 With eye on Brexit talks, May offers France money for border security Uber ex-CEO Travis Kalanick will officially be a billionaire Thursday, as deal with SoftBank closes The French government experiments with venture capitalism The World Bank’s “ease of doing business” report faces tricky questions Our Big Mac index shows fundamentals now matter more in currency markets The threat of tough regulation in Asia sends crypto-currencies into a tailspin Innovative materials from bamboo are helping a new industry to sprout A weak market for football rights suggests a lower value for sport Why driverless cars may mean jams tomorrow Chinese tech companies plan to steal American cloud firms’ thunder Masayoshi Son may raise yet more cash to pump into tech The hedge-fund delusion that grips pension-fund managers Ignore the bad housing starts number. Builder optimism and buyer demand are high Facebook launches 30-city Community Boost program Blockchain cryptocurrency wallet launches bitcoin buy and sell in the US to challenge Coinbase An overlooked, gutsy way for investors to make huge returns Tom Lee, bitcoin's earliest and most bullish forecaster on Wall Street, is even more positive after crash Netflix's original content will allow it to raise prices more than expected, Morgan Stanley says One way China could be clearing a path to investment ties in Western Europe It's a buy-the-dip story in the oil markets, says RBC's Helima Croft Intel's security patches are causing computers to randomly restart Comcast shares fall after downgrade on slowing broadband growth fear, streaming competition Forget DACA for now, let's keep the government open first, says GOP's Hensarling Tech giants are calling on Trump to preserve an immigration policy for spouses of skilled workers US housing starts down sharply on drop in single-family units Trump administration's infrastructure plan takes shape, focusing on state, local, and private financing Beware the ‘black hole’ that is GE, market watcher warns

Technology

How 2017 became a turning point for tech giants

This was a terrible year for the tech industry.

That’s an odd thing to say at a time of record growth and profits. In 2017, large American tech companies have kept hauling in more money, more users, and — to a degree that might seem dystopian — they continued to expand their foothold in our lives. This was a year in which Amazon created a way for its delivery drivers to let themselves into your house, and Apple created a phone you can unlock with your face.

Yet underneath this apparent success was a momentous shift in how the tech business deals with the world. Five or 10 years from now, we will come to regard 2017 as a turning point.

Why? Because this year, for the first time, tech giants began to grudgingly accept that they have some responsibility to the offline world. The scope of that responsibility, though, is another matter entirely.

Let me explain how this is all playing out.

“Platforms” are the shiniest prizes in the tech business. The reason the five most valuable American tech companies — Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Alphabet and Microsoft — are also the five most valuable American companies of any kind is that they own these fundamental building blocks of the digital economy, whether they are operating systems, app stores, social networks, cloud servers, or shipping and logistics infrastructure.

Think of these platforms as the roads, railroads and waterways of the information economy — an essentially inescapable part of life for any business or regular person who doesn’t live in a secluded cabin in the woods.

For years, despite their growing power, tech platforms rarely garnered much scrutiny, and they were often loathe to accept how much their systems affected the real world. Indeed, the online ethos has been that platforms aren’t really responsible for how people use them. It might as well be the slogan of Silicon Valley: We just make the tech, how people use it is another story.

In 2017, that changed. At first grudgingly and then with apparent enthusiasm, platform companies like Facebook began accepting some responsibility for how they are affecting the real world. They did not go as far as some critics would have liked — but in many significant ways they offered a shift in tone and tactics that suggested they were rethinking their positions.

You could argue that they had no choice. In the past year, social networks and search engines have been blamed for undermining the news media, fostering echo chambers, and spreading misinformation, hate, misogyny and other general social unpleasantness (YouTube, for example, removed lots of videos of kids gets getting pretend-tortured by their parents). There was also, of course, the unfolding saga of the companies’ role in Russia’s propaganda efforts, which resulted in them being hauled before lawmakers.

And then there were the larger questions about who makes the platforms and who benefits from them. The tech industry is overwhelmingly run by men, and it is a place of little racial and class diversity. A whistle-blowing blog post by Susan Fowler, an engineer who detailed a culture of harassment and misogyny at the ride-hailing company Uber, sparked a women’s movement in tech that was then subsumed by the global #MeToo movement.

Many tech titans were obviously unprepared for the serious questions that began coming their way a year ago. When the Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg was asked about his site’s role in the 2016 election just days after Donald J. Trump’s victory, he responded with a line from tech’s old playbook: It was a “pretty crazy idea,” he said, that misinformation on Facebook had “influenced the election in any way.”

Now that tone is gone. Mr. Zuckerberg has apologized for his glibness. And during Facebook’s last earnings report to investors, he put the company’s social mission at the top of his agenda. “Protecting our community is more important than maximizing our profits,” he said.

Several other tech execs have expressed similar commitments to a deeper mission. Timothy D. Cook, Apple’s chief executive, told my colleague Andrew Ross Sorkin that Apple has a “moral responsibility” to attempt to heal the nation’s social and economic fissures.

More from The New York Times:

Google, Looking to Tiptoe Back into China, Announces A.I. Center
Net Neutrality Protests Move Online, Yet Big Tech Is Quiet
I Was Wrong About Bitcoin. Here’s Why.

Sure, all this could just be marketing. But I’m inclined to believe the shift represents a new way of navigating the world, for a few reasons.

First, employees are demanding a new way. The highly paid workers of Silicon Valley were lured on the promise of changing the world, and in the past year many became demoralized about their companies’ apparent impact. In some cases they’re pushing their bosses to change.

Second, for the first time in years, there’s real pressure from lawmakers. That has resulted in some real-world retreats. For instance, tech giants last month stopped fighting a bill in Congress that would allow victims of sex trafficking to sue websites that supported the sex trade. In another time, this would have been a gimme for tech companies — they aren’t responsible for how people use their services, remember?

Not this time.

If the big shift of 2017 is that tech companies now accept some responsibility for how their platforms impact the world, the big mystery of 2018 and beyond is what, exactly, that responsibility will look like.

Mr. Zuckerberg said he was willing to risk the company’s profitability to improve its community. Facebook has been testing new ideas for making its News Feed less divisive and less prone to misinformation, and for promoting what the company calls “meaningful” social connections. Facebook is also testing systems that it said would more stringently police advertising, in the hope of preventing foreign actors from using its ad network to influence an election.

And in response to criticism from former Facebook employees that its tech might be addictive, the company said this week that it has conducted extensive research on the subject and was “using it to inform our product development.”

But what if these early efforts don’t mitigate the problems? What if Facebook finds that offering people a less polarized News Feed dramatically reduces engagement on its site, affecting its bottom line? Or what if the changes disproportionately affect one political ideology over another — would Facebook stick with a kind of responsibility that risks calling into question its impartiality?

I don’t mean to offer a barrage of hypotheticals just for the fun of it. My point is that these issues would probably be pretty hard to solve.

“Just as the packaged food industry did in the 1950s, Facebook and Google have lured users with convenience, while feeding them a diet certain to cause lasting harm,” Roger McNamee, the musician and venture capitalist, told me. “The problem cannot be addressed by hiring; it can only be fixed by changing the algorithms in ways that will materially reduce profitability.”

Or consider the question of diversity. I asked Ellen Pao — the former Reddit chief executive who unsuccessfully sued the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers for gender discrimination — what she made of the industry’s efforts to address the issue this year.

“I would give tech a C grade,” Ms. Pao, who is now the chief diversity and inclusion officer at the Kapor Center for Social Impact, wrote in an email. “Leaders are doing the bare minimum to address problems and are far from doing all that is necessary to solve the problem.”

She said she hoped for a far more vigorous effort that ushered in a complete overhaul of the culture of tech companies, and that held leaders accountable.

“It means firing all the people involved in the failures, from the C.E.O. to the H.R. leaders to the board members in some cases,” she wrote.

Ms. Pao’s and Mr. McNamee’s comments underline the real problem for the industry. Once you accept that you’re on the hook for fixing problems caused by the thing you built, people will start to expect that you really will fix them — even if the solutions are expensive or otherwise conflict with your business interests.

So, yeah, 2017 was a terrible year for the tech industry. If the fixing does not actually happen, 2018 might well be worse.

Email: farhad.manjoo@nytimes.com; Twitter: @fmanjoo.

Source: Tech CNBC
How 2017 became a turning point for tech giants

Comments are closed.