Homepage / Technology / AT&T-Time Warner ruling shows a need to reboot antitrust laws
Asia set for a cautious open as US-China trade tensions simmer Many companies at Cannes Lions had yachts, but Google, Facebook, Spotify and Twitter have beaches Tech could soon turn into the market's headache: Wells Fargo's Chris Harvey Forget millennials: Here's a good reason why Apple should hire your grandmother How Amazon's roaring success selling batteries is making it wonder which market it can disrupt next A company is showing how blockchain is more than just cryptocurrency — it can also cut food waste AT&T and Verizon have drones that could provide cell service and save lives this hurricane season How the Supreme Court may have made Web shopping pricier for just about everyone but Amazon How to choose between an Amazon Echo, a Google Home and an Apple HomePod Electric scooters draw hordes of investors and avid users — but a number of critics as well This floating robotic factory will build satellites and spaceships in orbit Meet the man whose job it is to reassure people that Google search isn’t evil Euro is here to stay: German finance minister China's ZTE expected to take last step to lift ban Cramer Remix: The best way to play the stress test results Red Hat CEO on earnings-led stock drop: 'I would encourage investors to look long term' Apple launches free repair program for MacBook and MacBook Pro keyboards The founder of JetBlue is about to start a new airline Tesla is suing an ex-employee for hacking into its 'MOS' software — here's what that system does Morgan Stanley sees 'a pattern forming' of the space industry developing like self-driving cars Buy Intel shares because its CEO change will not hurt the chipmaker: Credit Suisse Xiaomi reportedly awards founder $1.5 billion in stock ahead of IPO Tesla reports another fire at Fremont factory Tesla shares drop after analyst raises concern over a rise in its services costs Increased threat of a trade war is ramping up fears of a 'full-blown recession' CarMax shares surge to record high, on pace for their best day in 4 years If energy can clear one hard-to-break level, it’s off to the races, chart watcher says Warren Buffett: 'Any time the market takes a sharp dive,' read this book Supreme Court rules warrants required for cellphone location data Trump urges OPEC to 'keep prices down' as oil cartel's meeting wraps up Cramer: Strength in tech and retail has 'masked' weakness in the broader market Buy EA shares because it is ‘building a Netflix for video games’: Needham What’s at stake in Turkey’s elections, and why Erdogan could actually lose Facebook’s ‘lack of accountability’ in its data scandal spurs European sustainability fund to dump shares Goldman Sachs: GE should suspend dividend for the next 18 months OPEC ministers strike deal on oil production levels Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: BB, MDT, URI, JPM, BAC & more Pro tips on taking great video of your vacation — right from your phone All 35 times the market did this, stocks ended the year higher Bitcoin tumbles after Japan watchdog orders exchanges to beef up practices against money laundering Husband cheating? Ashley Madison says member signups spiked in these cities last year James Comey: Public anger about migrant children is ‘why Trump ran’ from the policy Chinese stocks are flirting with bear market territory as trade worries fester BlackBerry posts quarterly loss Friday will likely be the year's biggest stock market volume day with big action in Apple, JP Morgan Rival Koreas agree to reunions of war-separated families US companies like Micron are accusing China of intimidation and outright theft to dominate tech Disney said it's willing to divest more Fox assets for to get a deal cleared by regulators Tesla is preparing to close a dozen solar facilities in 9 states Uber driver was streaming Hulu show 'The Voice' just before self-driving car crash: Police report OPEC heads into showdown over oil output, with Saudi Arabia and Iran on different sides Chinese media says US has 'delusions' as impact of trade war spreads YouTube introduces paid subscriptions and merchandise selling in bid to help creators monetize the platform Airbus says no-deal Brexit would force it to reconsider UK presence European stocks seen slightly higher ahead of OPEC meeting Euro zone hits 'historic moment' as it closes eight years of financial support to Greece Trade tensions are the biggest risk for the euro zone, the IMF says With freedom to drive, Saudi Arabia's women could change the economy Taiwan's Foxconn says biggest challenge is US-China trade war Euro zone agrees on debt relief package for Greece Asian shares set to decline, taking cues from Wall Street's losses; OPEC meeting ahead Chevrolet is bringing back the Blazer as a crossover Cramer Remix: It was the hottest group in the market until Red Hat reported SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket wins Air Force certification and a $130 million contract Cramer goes out on a limb in support of chipmaker Micron Okta CEO explains why his cybersecurity company has a leg up on big-name tech giants like Microsoft Cramer: CEO change aside, Intel's stock is too cheap at these levels The head of Amazon's marketplace has lost most of his authority amid internal shake-up Alphabet reportedly may spin out molten-salt project with Bill Gates' $1 billion energy fund Red Hat slides on low guidance Tax automation company soars after Supreme Court decision Why Amazon is the winner of the Supreme Court sales tax ruling Why some women are adopting Tom Brady's anti-inflammatory diet Retail companies trying to catch up to the times are scrambling to buy tech start-ups Buy Square shares because its sales will soar from its new services to restaurants: Instinet Former retail CEOs hail online sales tax ruling: Old law rewarded a ‘form of tax evasion’ Mark Zuckerberg is the richest he's ever been — and he's about to beat Warren Buffett Tech pioneer Jaron Lanier says companies should pay for data: 'Let's get out of the manipulation business' Tesla enhancing security at Gigafactory, says they got call that ex-employee threatened violence Kroger shares on track for their best day in 9 years on strong earnings Goldman Sachs: Weak stock market returns are ahead even with booming earnings Trader builds $5 billion position after realizing he wasn't using test program; brokerage says he can't keep his profit Abraaj, a private-equity firm, files for provisional liquidation A wave of new environmental laws is scaring shipowners Glencore dodges American sanctions rather than spurn its friends A maverick French telecoms firm attempts Italian conquest Most stockmarket returns come from a tiny fraction of shares China considers its response to Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs Dutch finance chief opposes latest Franco-German push to bolster euro area Cramer: I have faith others can take charge at Intel after Brian Krzanich's ouster Supreme Court rules that states can force online shoppers to pay sales tax Jim Rogers is the latest aging investing guru to launch an ETF programmed to trade like them Olive Garden owner's shares jump after earnings beat, dividend hike Red-hot chip stock Micron rises as Wall Street gushes over cloud computing memory demand A tech goof might have just leaked the date for Amazon Prime Day Intel's Brian Krzanich forced out as CEO after 'consensual relationship' with employee The Amazon Fire TV Cube is so good I want one for every TV in my house Martin Sorrell says his exit from WPP was like being 'hit by the bus' Micron's quarterly results, forecasts beat on higher chip demand Goldman Sachs upgrades stumbling Verizon and Charter shares: 'The pipes are not broken'

Technology

AT&T-Time Warner ruling shows a need to reboot antitrust laws

The last time there was an antitrust ruling as important as the one handed down Tuesday by Judge Richard J. Leon, cellphones didn’t exist. There was no such thing as the internet. Personal computers were years away from mass adoption.

There had not been a federal court ruling on a vertical merger — a combination of a buyer and a supplier — since 1979. As a result, Judge Leon’s opinion, which cleared the way for the merger of AT&T and Time Warner, “will be enormously significant,” said Herbert Hovenkamp, an influential antitrust professor at the University of Pennsylvania. “To a significant extent, this court was writing on a clean slate.”

Judge Leon himself cited a “dearth” of modern judicial precedent.

For many antitrust experts, it was high time — no matter the outcome.

When it comes to vertical mergers like AT&T and Time Warner, “antitrust law is stuck in the 1980s,” said Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia Law School who has called for more vigorous antitrust enforcement against vertical mergers.

Read more from The New York Times:
Focus shifts to Comcast and 21st Century Fox after AT&T-Time Warner approval
Why the AT&T-Time Warner case was so closely watched
AT&T wins approval for $85.4 billion Time Warner deal in defeat for Justice Dept

A chorus of antitrust experts has already been calling for a fundamental rethinking of the prevailing laissez-faire approach to vertical mergers, and Judge Leon’s ruling is likely to amplify their critique. (The government will probably appeal the decision. The case theoretically could reach the Supreme Court, which has not considered a vertical merger since 1972.)

In allowing the merger, Judge Leon in many ways took the path of least resistance. However persuasive its arguments, the Justice Department, which sued to prevent the deal, could not cite a single recent precedent for blocking it.

The last time the government brought such a case was in 1979. The Federal Trade Commission challenged the merger of Fruehauf, then the country’s largest manufacturer of truck trailers, and Kelsey-Hayes, which made truck components like heavy-duty wheels and antiskid brakes. The government lost.

Credit for the lack of such cases goes largely to Robert H. Bork.

Mr. Bork is best known as the solicitor general who fired the Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox and as a doomed Supreme Court nominee, not as an antitrust trailblazer.

But in 1978, a year before the Fruehauf case, Mr. Bork, at the time a Yale law professor, published “The Antitrust Paradox.” The book argued that the main purpose of antitrust law was to protect consumers by encouraging economic efficiencies and that authorities, therefore, should not focus on blocking vertical deals. The argument had a profound and immediate impact on antitrust analysis and has been cited by numerous courts, including the Supreme Court.

The Clayton Antitrust Act, which dates to 1914, bans mergers that may “substantially lessen” competition or “tend to create a monopoly.” It makes no distinction between vertical mergers and horizontal ones, in which a company buys a rival, thereby reducing the number of competitors in an industry. But in large part thanks to Mr. Bork’s analysis, horizontal mergers continue to receive intense scrutiny from the federal government, while most vertical mergers go forward, albeit often with conditions.

From the publication of “The Antitrust Paradox” through 2016, the government has challenged only 52 of the thousands of vertical mergers, and many of those challenges were focused on horizontal aspects of the deals. None of those cases went to trial. Most were resolved through consent decrees, including Comcast’s 2009 bid for NBCUniversal, which went forward after Comcast and the government agreed to a long list of restrictions on the combined company’s behavior.

The Justice Department last rewrote its vertical merger guidelines in 1984. (The horizontal guidelines have been revised three times since then.) The department largely embraced Mr. Bork’s logic.

But over the ensuing decades, more antitrust experts have questioned Mr. Bork’s laissez-faire approach to vertical merger enforcement, especially in cases involving media and intellectual property.

The most immediate impacts of the ruling on Tuesday are the removal of an obstacle to a megamerger and the likely bursting of a dam of mergers that were waiting the decision.

But the most important aspect of Judge Leon’s opinion is that it essentially embraces the Bork approach, which rested on a few premises: that markets are inherently competitive; that a firm’s dominance in one market cannot be leveraged into another; and that market success is a result of maximizing consumer welfare, not anti-competitive behavior. The theory is that vertical mergers produce efficiencies that can be passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices, higher quality or both.

Not surprisingly, AT&T argued in court that it had no incentive to withhold Time Warner’s programming from other distributors, that consumers would derive many benefits from the merger and that the combined companies would be in a better position to compete with upstarts like Amazon and Netflix, which already are vertically integrated.

This analysis may still hold true for mergers of essentially fungible components, like the truck beds and brakes at issue in the Fruehauf case.

But it’s not clear that logic holds in a case like AT&T’s merger with Time Warner. Not only does AT&T occupy a dominant position in a highly concentrated telecommunications market, but Time Warner product’s — like HBO’s “Game of Thrones” and CNN — aren’t at all fungible. If AT&T wants to withhold “must have” programming from a rival telecom company, or charge more for it, that company cannot readily replace it. That was the crux of the government’s case — that vertical mergers, at least in this context, can reduce competition and harm consumers.

“The big question was whether Judge Leon would accept where academics and economists have gone with this, or whether he’d stick with the old approach,” said Mr. Wu, the Columbia law professor, who is also a contributing opinion writer for The New York Times.

Judge Leon, who stressed that his decision should not be taken as a broad precedent, went with the old approach.

Although Mr. Bork’s fingerprints are all over the opinion, Judge Leon departed from Mr. Bork’s doctrine by acknowledging that vertical mergers “are not invariably innocuous.”

But the emergence of competitors like Netflix, Amazon and Hulu loomed large in his analysis. “I simply cannot evaluate the government’s theories,” he wrote in his opinion, without considering “the dramatic changes that are transforming how consumers are viewing video content.”

No matter the outcome if the decision is appealed, the Justice Department “is going to have to update the vertical merger guidelines,” said Steven C. Salop, professor of law and economics at Georgetown University Law Center.

Professor Salop outlined a possible new approach in an article last month in The Yale Law Journal. He proposed assessing the potential competitive harm from vertical mergers by using modern economic tools. His approach would examine the market power wielded by the parties to the merger and consider what remedies might be appropriate if the potential harm outweighed the benefits. Significantly, he would abandon the Bork presumption that vertical mergers benefit consumers.

Using that approach, the AT&T-Time Warner merger should have been blocked, he contends. Judge Leon’s opinion in many ways embraced his approach — and cited him in the opinion — while reaching the opposite result.

Mr. Hovenkamp, of the University of Pennsylvania, argues that it’s not wise or appropriate to view antitrust cases through the prism of a pre-internet, pre-broadband age. That’s especially true when the stakes include principles like consumers’ ability to engage in (or at least watch on TV) a free exchange of ideas.

“Antitrust is only a piece of this,” Mr. Hovenkamp said. “We’ll never roll back the clock,” he added, to an era when “the phone companies and most cable companies had nothing to do with media.”

“Now everyone thinks they have to be fully integrated to keep up,” he continued. “I feel uncomfortable with that both for antitrust and First Amendment reasons.”

Source: Tech CNBC
AT&T-Time Warner ruling shows a need to reboot antitrust laws

Comments are closed.