Homepage / Technology / Here’s why Google had the right to fire that employee over his diversity memo
Базовые правила и условия игры в kazino online на настоящие деньги Ana amaç çevrimiçi kumarhane 7slots: önemli avantajlar ve kategoriler Как начать игру в казино онлайн на настоящие деньги 1win Apk: Um Melhor Aplicativo Pra Jogos De Cassino Aqui No Brasil” 1win Apk: Um Melhor Aplicativo Pra Jogos De Cassino Aqui No Brasil” Mostbet Azerbaycan Rəsmi Casino Giriş Və Qeydiyyat Mostbet A Миссди Ххк Cassino Online Operating System Melhores Jogos At The Bônu 1win Mali Site Officiel des Paris Sportifs et Casino Inscription 1xbet Aviator How To Play The Aviartor Game On 1xbet In Nigeri прохода 1win Официальный Сайт Букмекерской Конторы же Казино 1ви Скачать Пин Ап Казино%3A Мобильное Приложение Pin Up Be Laurence Escalantes online casino empire feels heat of US lawsuits 1xbet Paid For Over $836, 000 To A Player From Africa Казино Покердом Играть Онлайн Бесплатно%2C официальный Сайт%2C Скачать Клиен Бесплатные Игры Казино Слоты И Игровые Автомат “казино Pin Up%3A находимся Вместе К вожделенной Мечте Ücretsiz Slot Oyunları Silvergames’te Çevrimiçi Oynayın Mostbet Bookie: Legjobb Szorzók És Élő Fogadási Élmény Online Mostbet Login To Your Online Casino Personal Account In Bangladesh! Top 10 Best Online Gambling Dens In 2024 Tested & Approve Powerful casino tactics in 2024: 7 vital methods for athletes Guide to Online Casinos in Canada “Online Kumarhane Oyna Çevrimiçi Kumarhane Nolimitwa Legalzoom Hisse Geri Alım Programını 75 Milyon Dolar Artırdı Yazar Investing Co Как играть в симуляторы в онлайн-казино Вавада Игровые Автоматы Демо Играть Бесплатно нет Регистраци Glory Casino: Top Online Casino Video Games In Banglades Рейтинг Надежных Онлайн Казино Лучшие Топ Клубы Росси Fortune Tiger Slot Review: Análise E Como Joga 1win Au Bénin: Une Revue Complète De La Plateforme De Paris En Lign Sledování Titulu Casino Suprême: Kde Sledovat What is a Data Room? Как Стать Стримером Казино%3F Что для Этого Нужно%3 Best Game Software How to Design Engaging and Effective Educational Events Winline Делает Разницу! Букмекерская Контора Winline Онлайн Ставки На Спорт Making Corporate Travel Arrangements Business Virtual Data Room Stock Market Tips For Beginners What to Look for in a VDR Provider Why You Need a Secure Data Room Learning in the Digital Age How to Apply For Business Loans VDR and Document Management Performance Management and HR Outsourcing Modern Business Integration How to Choose the Right Board Portal Software for Your Company How to Choose a Data Storage Room Why Startups Use a Data Room for Investors The Best Web Tools for Designers Use Cases For Using VDR Documents Subsidy Programs and Financing Innovative Technologies for Audit What Is Real Estate Management? Investment and Funds Inspiring Teaching Books What Are the Benefits of a Virtual Data Room? Startups and Business Ideas How to Improve Virtual Board Communication The Lego Company History Investing in the Biotech Industry Financial Startup Basics Jogue Por Dinheiro Actual Em Cassino Onlin Virtual Communication Methods for Remote Leaders How to Choose the Best VDR Providers How Successful Online Businesses Succeed How Business Experts Fuel Innovation and Create Competitive Edge The IT World and Business Deal Making Software and How it Can Help Your Business Virtual Data Room Software Types of Steel Materials and Their Uses Board of Directors Software Bonver Casino Cz Hrací Automaty S Bonusem Zdarm Magazyn Żużel Speedway W Polsce I Na Świeci What Is Logistics School? What Is the VDR for Acquisition? The Best Data Room Apps For Startups Best Practices for Creating an Effective Board Meeting Agenda How to Choose the Best Shareholders Online Platforms Ostdeutsche Biersorten Getting a Construction Management Degree How to Select an Online Data Room Provider Start Your Blog Without Investment What to Look for in a Board Room Provider Data Room Comparison – Which Data Room Is Right For Your Business? Zakłady Sportowe Online Autógrafo Bukmacherska 1xbe “Pin-up O Melhor Cassino Do Brasil Web Site Oficial ᐈ Jogar Caça-níquei Rotating Events in Our Time How to Choose the Best Business Software Choosing an Online Payment Processor Due Diligence Software Virtual Data Room Providers for M&A Due Diligence The Best Online Data Room Benefits of a Due Diligence Data Room Best Practices for Data Rooms Types of Corporate Governance What Is Virtual Data Storage? Benefits of Document Distribution Software The Benefits of a Data Room for Startups Effective Project Management Requires a Mix of Technical and People Skills

Technology

Here’s why Google had the right to fire that employee over his diversity memo

Comments now are pouring in over the termination on Monday of Google software engineer James Damore, who sent a memo to co-workers on Friday challenging some of the tech giant’s diversity efforts, such as mentoring programs open only to people of a certain race or gender.

Gizmodo posted the memo on the internet on Saturday and it since has gone viral. The memo contained provocative statements suggesting that women were “generally” biologically, temperamentally, or motivationally less suited for positions as software engineers or tech leaders than men are. (Read 10 of the most shocking quotes from the memo.)

Many inside and outside of Google called for Damore’s dismissal. Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai said that Damore was fired for “advancing harmful gender stereotypes” in the memo. Google may have had the legal right to fire Damore for that reason, notwithstanding the ways some of what Damore said in his memo was legally protected.

As an initial matter, Damore almost certainly was an at-will employee (meaning, he probably doesn’t have a special contract). That means that Google could terminate his employment for any reason that did not offend fundamental public policy, such as the laws against discrimination, or no cause at all.

Google had the right to fire Damore for what the company perceived to be sexually harassing behavior, even if the comments did not so alter the workplace of female Google employees that it made Damore’s comments legally actionable sexual harassment. Google cited its code of conduct that prohibits behavior beyond what the law prohibits.

Here is why the areas of the law that protected some of Damore’s memo may not be enough to give him legal recourse against the company.

First, federal labor law does, indeed, bar even non-union employers like Google from punishing an employee for communicating with fellow employees about improving working conditions. The purpose of the memo was to persuade Google to abandon certain diversity-related practices the engineer found objectionable and to convince co-workers to join his cause, or at least discuss the points he raised. But no evidence has surfaced so far that Google fired Damore for engaging in this protected activity in terminating his employment. Instead, the company cited what it considered Damore’s unprotected activity in making its decision. Damore may be unable to meet his challenging burden of showing otherwise.

Second, Damore’s memo was styled as a lament to “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber.” Damore’s comments about his perceived marginalization as a conservative in a predominantly liberal corporate culture arguably were protected by California law that prohibits employers from threatening to fire employees to get them to adopt or refrain from adopting a particular political course of action.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai recognized that when he said in his memo to employees that “we strongly support the right of Googlers to express themselves, and much of what was in that memo is fair to debate. . . .” But Damore went beyond that and that the memo contained protected speech may not have precluded Google from taking action on what was not protected. Google may be expected to assert that it fired Damore not to silence a dissenter, but to expel a harasser.

Third, the engineer complained in parts of his memo about company policies that he believes violate employment discrimination laws. Those policies include support programs limited by race or gender and promotional and hiring scoring policies that consider race and gender. It is unlawful for an employer to discipline an employee for challenging conduct that the employee reasonably believed to be discriminatory, even when a court later determines the conduct was not actually prohibited by the discrimination laws. In other words, the engineer doesn’t have to be right that some of Google’s diversity initiatives are unlawful, only that he reasonably believes that they are.

All of that is true, but it also is true that there is no evidence that Google terminated Damore for those aspects of his memo. In any challenge to this termination, Google’s non-retaliatory motive will matter. To be more precise, it is the motive of the people who made the decision to fire Damore, not those in the company who may have other reasons potentially tainted with illegality, that will matter.

Google Vice President of Diversity, Inclusion & Governance Danielle Brown is correct that an employee has no right to engage in workplace discourse that offends anti-discrimination laws; employees may not engage in unlawful harassment under the guise of protected concerted activity or political grievances.

If that is what motivated Google is terminating Damore, the termination may not be legally actionable.

One response Google could have taken to Damore’s memo was continuation of the dialogue. Google chose termination of his employment instead. Damore will face a steep legal hurdle attempting to show that he was terminated because of illegal motives and not a lawful one.

Commentary by Dan Eaton, a partner with the San Diego law firm of Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek, where his practice focuses on defending and advising employers. He also is a professor at the San Diego State University Fowler College of Business where he teaches classes in business ethics and employment law. Follow him on Twitter @DanEatonlaw.

For more insight from CNBC contributors, follow @CNBCopinion on Twitter.

Source: Tech CNBC
Here’s why Google had the right to fire that employee over his diversity memo

Comments are closed.